KONG 401 & 400 error

If you’re getting 401 and 400 intermittently from the upstream service, that strongly suggests authentication-related issues, often tied to token forwarding, expiration, or format mismatch.


🔁 Quick Summary of Key Differences

StatusMeaningCommon Cause
401UnauthorizedMissing/invalid/expired credentials
400Bad RequestMalformed or incomplete request (e.g. OIDC token request)

🧠 Intermittent 401 + 400: Common Root Causes

🔸 1. Expired or Reused Tokens

  • Kong gets a token once, caches it, and keeps using it—but upstream expects a fresh one.
  • Especially common with client credentials or authorization code flows.

Solution:

  • Set token caching to short duration or disable it in the OIDC plugin: config: cache_ttl: 0 # Or a very short TTL like 5

🔸 2. Multiple Consumers with Invalid Secrets

  • One client (consumer) is configured correctly, others are not.
  • You see 401/400 when the bad client makes a request.

Solution:

  • Enable verbose logging in Kong: export KONG_LOG_LEVEL=debug kong reload Then correlate consumer_id with the error.

🔸 3. Kong Not Forwarding Tokens Correctly

  • Kong authenticates but doesn’t forward Authorization header to the upstream.
  • Some plugins strip headers by default.

Solution:

  • Add request-transformer plugin to pass the token: curl -X POST http://localhost:8001/services/YOUR_SERVICE/plugins \ --data "name=request-transformer" \ --data "config.add.headers=Authorization:Bearer $(jwt_token)"

🔸 4. OIDC Plugin Misconfiguration

If you’re using the OpenID Connect plugin:

  • grant_type, client_id, or redirect_uri may be wrong or missing intermittently.
  • Kong might request a new token but fail to pass a correct one.

Check:

  • Kong OIDC plugin config
  • Errors like: error=invalid_request error_description="Unsupported client authentication method"

🧪 How to Debug Effectively

  1. Set KONG_LOG_LEVEL=debug, reload Kong, and tail the logs: tail -f /usr/local/kong/logs/error.log
  2. Inspect Upstream Request:
    • Look for what headers/body Kong is sending.
    • Especially Authorization, Content-Type, and request body if OIDC is involved.
  3. Track Errors to a Specific Consumer:
    • Use consumer_id in the access log to trace.
    • Maybe only some consumers are misconfigured.
  4. Try Curling the Upstream Directly with the exact payload Kong sends (use Postman or curl): curl -X POST https://upstream/token \ -H "Authorization: Bearer <your_token>" \ -H "Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded" \ -d "grant_type=client_credentials&client_id=...&client_secret=..."

to check

  • Kong plugin configs (especially OIDC/JWT)
  • A few lines from Kong’s debug logs showing the upstream request/response
  • Whether you’re using Ping Identity or a custom upstream

kong – 2 services same route

In Kong Gateway, you cannot have two services bound to the exact same route — a route must be unique in terms of its combination of matching rules (such as paths, hosts, methods, etc.).


🚫 Why You Can’t Have Duplicate Routes

Kong uses the route’s matching criteria to determine which service should handle a request. If two routes have the same matching rules, Kong can’t disambiguate, which leads to a conflict error when trying to create the second route.

For example:

# Service A
curl -i -X POST http://localhost:8001/services/ --data name=service-a --data url=http://api-a
curl -i -X POST http://localhost:8001/routes --data name=route-a --data service.name=service-a --data paths[]=/api

# Service B
curl -i -X POST http://localhost:8001/services/ --data name=service-b --data url=http://api-b
curl -i -X POST http://localhost:8001/routes --data name=route-b --data service.name=service-b --data paths[]=/api

⛔ The second POST /routes will fail with:

HTTP 409 Conflict – duplicate entry


✅ Workarounds / Alternatives

GoalSolution
Blue/Green or Canary DeploymentsUse Kong Plugins (e.g., traffic-split, canary) or upstreams and targets instead of duplicate routes.
Different consumers/users hitting different backendsUse request transformers, ACLs, or Kong Enterprise Route-by-header/Route-by-consumer plugins.
Same path, different method or hostYou can differentiate routes by methods[], hosts[], or headers.

🧪 Example: Two Routes with Same Path, Different Hosts

# Route 1
curl -i -X POST http://localhost:8001/routes \
  --data name=api-v1 \
  --data paths[]=/api \
  --data hosts[]=v1.example.com \
  --data service.name=service-a

# Route 2
curl -i -X POST http://localhost:8001/routes \
  --data name=api-v2 \
  --data paths[]=/api \
  --data hosts[]=v2.example.com \
  --data service.name=service-b

These can coexist because their hosts[] fields are different.


🧠 Summary

Route Matching RuleMust Be Unique For
paths[]Same host/methods/headers
hosts[]If combined with same path
methods[], headersCan disambiguate routes with same path

If you’re trying to achieve load balancing, blue-green deployment, or AB testing between services at the same route — I can help you set that up using upstreams + targets or the traffic-split plugin.

Would you like an example?

kong – ssl client

Yes, when using Kong Konnect with an OIDC (OpenID Connect) client, SSL (TLS) is typically required in production environments for both security and functional reasons. Here’s a breakdown of why:


✅ Why SSL/TLS is Required for OIDC with Kong Konnect

1. OIDC Specification Requires HTTPS

  • The OIDC standard mandates that communication between clients and identity providers (IdPs) must use HTTPS to protect tokens and credentials.
  • For example, the redirect_uri used in the OIDC flow must be HTTPS, or most IdPs will reject it.

2. Kong Konnect’s OIDC Plugin Requires HTTPS for Secure Redirects

  • If you’re using the Kong OIDC plugin, especially in Authorization Code Flow, Kong must redirect users to the IdP and then receive the callback securely.
  • Without SSL, the redirect URI may be considered invalid or insecure by the IdP.

KONG – 504

Common Causes

  1. Upstream service is slow or down
  2. DNS resolution delay or failure
  3. Incorrect protocol (HTTP vs HTTPS)
  4. Upstream timeout too low in Kong config
  5. Load balancer or firewall in between is blocking/delaying

If you’re seeing upstream_status=504 in Kong logs, it means:

Kong sent the request to the upstream (your backend service), but did not receive a response within the configured timeout, so it returned a 504 Gateway Timeout to the client.


🔍 What to Check When You See upstream_status=504

✅ 1. Verify Upstream is Healthy

Try to access your upstream from the Kong host directly:

curl -v http://<upstream-host>:<port>/<endpoint>

  • If this is slow or hangs → your backend is the problem.
  • If it fails to connect → network or DNS issue.

✅ 2. Increase Kong Timeouts

Timeouts are per-service. You can increase them using the Admin API:

curl -X PATCH http://localhost:8001/services/{service_name} \
  --data "connect_timeout=10000" \
  --data "read_timeout=15000" \
  --data "write_timeout=10000"

All values are in milliseconds.


✅ 3. Check Protocol Mismatch (HTTP vs HTTPS)

If your upstream uses HTTPS but the service is configured with protocol = http, Kong cannot complete the TLS handshake and may hang.

Fix it with:

curl -X PATCH http://localhost:8001/services/{service_name} \
  --data "protocol=https"


✅ 4. Check Kong Error Log

Run:

tail -n 100 /usr/local/kong/logs/error.log | grep timeout

You may see:

[error] ... upstream timed out (110: Connection timed out) while reading response header from upstream


✅ 5. Check Health of Upstream Targets (If Using Upstreams)

curl http://localhost:8001/upstreams/{upstream_name}/health

If all targets are unhealthy, Kong will return 504s.


✅ 6. Review Load Balancer / Firewall Rules

If Kong goes through:

  • A corporate firewall
  • A cloud load balancer
  • An IPsec/VPN tunnel

Timeouts or dropped packets there can also lead to 504.


📘 Example Full Troubleshooting Flow

  1. Run from Kong host/container: curl -v http://your-upstream-host:port/health
  2. If that times out:
    • Check if service is running.
    • Check firewall rules.
  3. Increase Kong timeouts: curl -X PATCH http://localhost:8001/services/my-api \ --data "read_timeout=20000"
  4. Check logs: tail -f /usr/local/kong/logs/error.log

If you paste the exact Kong service config and a log snippet with upstream_status=504, I can give you a more specific fix.

A 504 Gateway Timeout from Kong means:

🔴 Kong Gateway sent a request to your upstream service, but didn’t get a response in time, so it gave up and returned a 504 to the client.


✅ QUICK FIX CHECKLIST

CheckAction
⏱ Timeout too short?Increase timeout values for the service
🔌 Backend down?Test the backend directly from Kong
❌ Wrong protocol?Ensure the protocol is set correctly (http vs https)
🔐 Firewall?Check network/firewall between Kong and upstream
📉 Backend overloaded?Review CPU/memory on backend service
🔁 Load balancer in the path?Check intermediate LB timeouts

🧪 1. Test the Backend Directly

From Kong host or container:

curl -v http://<upstream-host>:<port>/health

If this hangs or fails, the issue is upstream—not Kong.


🛠️ 2. Increase Kong Timeouts

Use the Admin API:

curl -X PATCH http://localhost:8001/services/{service_name} \
  --data "connect_timeout=10000" \
  --data "read_timeout=15000" \
  --data "write_timeout=10000"

(All values are in milliseconds.)


🔐 3. Check Protocol Mismatch

Is your backend using HTTPS but your service uses HTTP?

Fix:

curl -X PATCH http://localhost:8001/services/{service_name} \
  --data "protocol=https"


📄 4. Check Kong Logs

Look in:

/usr/local/kong/logs/error.log

Typical timeout error:

upstream timed out (110: Connection timed out) while reading response header from upstream


🧰 5. Enable Correlation ID for Tracing

Enable this to track requests:

curl -X POST http://localhost:8001/plugins \
  --data "name=correlation-id" \
  --data "config.header_name=X-Correlation-ID" \
  --data "config.generator=uuid" \
  --data "config.echo_downstream=true"

Now check logs using the X-Correlation-ID.


If you send your service config or a log example with upstream_status=504, I’ll pinpoint the issue faster.

The error “An invalid response from upstream server” in Kong typically means:

Kong was able to connect to the upstream service, but the response it got back was malformed, empty, or violated protocol expectations.


🔍 Common Root Causes

CauseDescription
Empty responseUpstream sent no body or headers back
⚠️ Invalid HTTP formatResponse doesn’t follow HTTP spec
🔐 SSL/TLS mismatchHTTP used with HTTPS backend or vice versa
🧱 Protocol errorUpstream speaking gRPC, WebSocket, or another protocol unexpectedly
🔌 Upstream closed connectionBefore Kong finished reading the response

✅ How to Troubleshoot

1. Check Logs

Look for this in Kong’s error log:

tail -f /usr/local/kong/logs/error.log

Common message:

upstream prematurely closed connection while reading response header

2. Test Upstream Manually

Run from the Kong host or container:

curl -i http://<upstream-host>:<port>/<path>

If you get no response or a malformed one, the problem is the upstream.


3. Verify Protocol

Make sure you’re not calling an HTTPS backend as HTTP:

# Fix protocol
curl -X PATCH http://localhost:8001/services/{service_name} \
  --data "protocol=https"


4. Increase Read Timeout

Sometimes upstreams are just too slow:

curl -X PATCH http://localhost:8001/services/{service_name} \
  --data "read_timeout=15000"


5. Check Upstream for Non-Standard Response

If the upstream returns:

  • Non-HTTP data (e.g., binary, gRPC without HTTP/1.1 framing)
  • Incorrect headers
  • Incomplete response

It will break Kong’s HTTP parser.


🧪 Bonus: Use Request Termination for Testing

Temporarily override the upstream to test Kong behavior:

curl -X POST http://localhost:8001/services/{service_name}/plugins \
  --data "name=request-termination" \
  --data "config.status_code=200"

If this works, the issue is 100% upstream-related.


If you can share the log snippet or the upstream service config (or test curl output), I can give you a pinpointed fix.

kong token expiration

If a token is issued with a 20-minute expiration time, it remains valid until it expires, regardless of whether a new token is issued afterward.

So:

  • Token A is issued at 14:00 → expires at 14:20.
  • Token B is issued at 14:05 → expires at 14:25.

Token A is still valid until 14:20, even though Token B was generated later.

Exceptions:

Some systems revoke old tokens when a new one is issued. This depends on the implementation:

  • Stateless tokens (e.g., JWT): Typically not revoked unless explicitly blacklisted or the signing key is rotated.
  • Stateful tokens (e.g., stored in a DB): The server might mark previous tokens as invalid upon issuing a new one.

To summarize:

Yes, the first token is still valid unless your system has explicit revocation logic

Kong error

The error:

no credentials found for given iss

in the Kong OIDC plugin means:

Kong received a token or request with an issuer (iss) claim, but it cannot find a matching configuration for that issuer.


🔍 Why This Happens

This usually occurs in one of these scenarios:

1. Missing or Incorrect config.issuer in the OIDC plugin

  • You did not set the exact issuer URL from Ping Identity in the plugin config.
  • Or you set it, but it’s spelled or formatted differently than what’s in the JWT’s iss claim.

Example:
If the token contains:

"iss": "https://auth.pingone.com/12345/as"

Then your OIDC plugin must be configured with:

config.issuer=https://auth.pingone.com/12345/as


2. Wrong Discovery Document

Kong uses the issuer to retrieve:

<issuer>/.well-known/openid-configuration

If the URL is incorrect or inaccessible, it can’t discover metadata and fails.


3. Token Issuer Doesn’t Match Plugin Config

  • You’re sending a JWT token manually (e.g., in Authorization: Bearer) and it’s not issued by the issuer you configured.
  • Kong expects the iss claim to match the config.issuer.

✅ Fix Steps

Step 1: Extract the Token’s Issuer

Run:

jwt decode <your-token>

Or paste the JWT into jwt.io and check the iss field.

Step 2: Update Plugin Config

Ensure the OIDC plugin config matches the exact iss value:

curl -X PATCH http://localhost:8001/plugins/<plugin-id> \
  --data "config.issuer=https://auth.pingone.com/12345/as"

Or if creating fresh:

curl -X POST http://localhost:8001/services/my-service/plugins \
  --data "name=openid-connect" \
  --data "config.issuer=https://auth.pingone.com/12345/as" \
  ...


🧪 Test Again

Once updated:

  1. Clear browser session or test in Postman
  2. Trigger the login flow again
  3. Ensure Kong receives a token from Ping with matching iss

Would you like help decoding the token or verifying your current plugin setup? You can paste the token header (without the signature) and I’ll check it.

Splunk

he size of an API response can vary depending on several factors like the data being returned, server and client limits, and performance considerations. Here’s a breakdown of key aspects:


🔹 Typical Size Limits

  • REST APIs (JSON):
    • Common practical limits: 1–10 MB
    • Best practice: Keep responses under 1 MB for speed and reliability
  • GraphQL APIs:
    • Can return large nested objects, but pagination and limits are recommended
    • Many GraphQL servers default to 1 MB–5 MB limits
  • gRPC / Protobuf APIs:
    • Binary and more compact
    • Common limit: 4 MB (can be increased with config)

🔹 Platform & Framework Default Limits

Platform/FrameworkDefault Max Response Size
AWS API Gateway10 MB
Azure API Management100 MB (but gzip recommended)
Google Cloud Endpoints~32 MB
Node.js (Express)Unlimited, but memory-bound
Nginx reverse proxy1 MB (can be tuned with client_max_body_size)

🔹 Practical Guidelines

  • Use pagination for large datasets (e.g., limit=100&offset=0)
  • Enable compression (e.g., Gzip or Brotli) to reduce response size
  • Stream data (if large file or binary) rather than returning in a single response
  • Split large responses across multiple endpoints if needed

🔹 API Response Size Debugging

You can check actual size using tools like:

bashCopyEditcurl -s -w "%{size_download}\n" -o /dev/null https://api.example.com/data

Let me know your use case — REST, GraphQL, or gRPC — and I can give optimized recommendations.

MapR cluster

NodeCLDBZooKeeperRMHistoryServerNodeManagerFileserverMetrics
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

MapR Metrics Overview

🧩 Built-In Components

  • mapr-metrics: Core service that collects and stores metrics data
  • mapr-metrics-collector: Gathers performance metrics and feeds them into MapR Monitoring DB
  • mapr-metrics-role: Enables metrics roles on all nodes

Install these packages on each node (especially CLDB and RM nodes):

bashCopyEdityum install -y mapr-metrics mapr-metrics-collector

KONG – JWT plugins

For JWT plugins in Kong, client certificates are not typically required as part of the JWT validation process. However, let’s clarify based on potential misunderstandings:


✅ JWT Plugin Basics (No client certs needed)

  • JWT authentication in Kong works by verifying the JWT signature using either a shared secret (HS256) or a public key (RS256/ES256).
  • Kong does not require client certificates unless you are adding mutual TLS (mTLS) as an extra layer.

🔐 When Client Certificates Are Required

If you’re also enabling mTLS authentication using plugins like mtls-auth, or using Kong in a setup where TLS client auth is enforced at the proxy level, then:

  • Yes, you will typically use different client certificates per environment (dev/uat/prod) for security isolation and credential scoping.
  • This ensures:
    • Compromise in dev doesn’t impact prod.
    • You can rotate/test certs independently.

💡 Best Practice (if mTLS is involved)

EnvironmentClient CertNotes
Devclient-dev.crtLower trust level, used for testing
UATclient-uat.crtFor staging/pre-prod
Prodclient-prod.crtStrict security, strong validation policies

🎯 Summary

  • 🔸 For JWT plugin alone: No client certs are needed.
  • 🔸 If you combine with mTLS: Yes, use separate client certs per environment.
  • 🔒 Always store keys securely and rotate them periodically.

Kong troubleshooting

A 502 Bad Gateway error in your setup:

Client → LB → KONG → LB → Server

means that Kong Gateway cannot successfully connect to the upstream server behind the second load balancer. Here’s how to troubleshoot and resolve it step by step:


🔁 Understanding the Flow

  1. Client hits the first LB (e.g., AWS ELB, NGINX).
  2. That LB forwards traffic to Kong Gateway.
  3. Kong receives the request and proxies it to a second LB.
  4. That LB routes to your actual upstream service.

🛠️ Troubleshooting Checklist

✅ 1. Check Upstream URL in Kong

  • Run: curl -s http://<KONG_ADMIN>:8001/services/<service-name>
  • Ensure the upstream URL (url or host) points to a valid, resolvable address (DNS or IP) and correct port.

Example:

{
  "host": "internal-lb.yourdomain.local",
  "port": 8080,
  "protocol": "http"
}

✅ 2. Test Kong’s Network Reachability

From the Kong container or host:

curl -v http://internal-lb.yourdomain.local:8080/

If this fails:

  • DNS resolution might be broken
  • Port might be blocked
  • LB might not route correctly

✅ 3. Enable Debug Logs in Kong

In kong.conf or via environment variable:

log_level = debug

Then check:

tail -f /usr/local/kong/logs/error.log

Look for messages like:

  • upstream timed out
  • could not resolve host
  • connection refused

✅ 4. Check Health of Second LB and Backend

  • Ensure second LB is up
  • Verify backend servers are healthy and accepting connections
  • Check if Kong’s IP is allowed (firewall or security group)

✅ 5. Check Kong Route & Service Configuration

Validate route is defined correctly:

curl -s http://<KONG_ADMIN>:8001/routes

Make sure paths, hosts, or methods match the request.


🧪 Example Kong Service & Route Setup

# Service pointing to internal load balancer
curl -i -X POST http://localhost:8001/services \
  --data name=upstream-service \
  --data url=http://internal-lb.yourdomain.local:8080

# Route for the service
curl -i -X POST http://localhost:8001/services/upstream-service/routes \
  --data paths[]=/api


🚫 Common Causes of 502 with LB Behind Kong

ProblemSolution
DNS resolution failureUse IP or fix /etc/resolv.conf or CoreDNS
Port not exposed or wrongConfirm port with nc or curl
Second LB not forwarding correctlyCheck LB target groups and health checks
Kong plugins (e.g., OIDC, rate-limit) errorDisable plugins temporarily to isolate
HTTP vs HTTPS mismatchEnsure protocol matches (http vs https)
Timeout too shortIncrease proxy_read_timeout or similar

✅ Final Tips

  • Try curl directly from Kong to the backend server.
  • Use Kong’s health check endpoint if you’re using upstream targets: curl http://localhost:8001/upstreams/<name>/health

If you share:

  • the exact curl call to Kong
  • the relevant Kong service/route config
  • error.log content from Kong

The error message “upstream prematurely closed connection while reading response header from upstream” in Kong Gateway indicates that Kong attempted to read the response headers from the upstream service, but the connection was closed unexpectedly before the headers were fully received. This typically results in a 502 Bad Gateway error.

Common Causes

  1. Upstream Service Crashes or Terminates Connection Early:
    • The upstream application may crash, encounter an error, or intentionally close the connection before sending a complete response.
  2. Timeouts:
    • The upstream service takes too long to respond, exceeding Kong’s configured timeouts.
  3. Keepalive Connection Issues:
    • Persistent connections (keepalive) between Kong and the upstream service may be closed unexpectedly by the upstream, leading to this error.
  4. Protocol Mismatch:
    • Kong expects a certain protocol (e.g., HTTP/1.1), but the upstream service responds differently or uses an incompatible protocol.
  5. Large Response Headers:
    • The upstream service sends headers that exceed Kong’s buffer sizes, causing the connection to be closed prematurely.

es, a mismatch between the protocol specified in Kong’s service configuration and the actual protocol used by the upstream service can lead to the error:

“upstream prematurely closed connection while reading response header from upstream”

This typically occurs when Kong attempts to communicate with an upstream service over HTTP, but the upstream expects HTTPS, or vice versa.


🔍 Understanding the Issue

When Kong is configured to connect to an upstream service, it uses the protocol specified in the service’s configuration. If the upstream service expects HTTPS connections and Kong is configured to use HTTP, the SSL/TLS handshake will fail, leading to the connection being closed prematurely.

Yes, a mismatch between the protocol specified in Kong’s service configuration and the actual protocol used by the upstream service can lead to the error:

“upstream prematurely closed connection while reading response header from upstream”

This typically occurs when Kong attempts to communicate with an upstream service over HTTP, but the upstream expects HTTPS, or vice versa.


🔍 Understanding the Issue

When Kong is configured to connect to an upstream service, it uses the protocol specified in the service’s configuration. If the upstream service expects HTTPS connections and Kong is configured to use HTTP, the SSL/TLS handshake will fail, leading to the connection being closed prematurely.

For example, if your upstream service is accessible at https://api.example.com, but Kong is configured with:

bashCopyEditcurl -i -X POST http://localhost:8001/services \
  --data name=example-service \
  --data url=http://api.example.com

Kong will attempt to connect over HTTP, resulting in a failed connection.


✅ Solution

Ensure that the protocol in Kong’s service configuration matches the protocol expected by the upstream service.

If the upstream service requires HTTPS, configure the service in Kong accordingly:

bashCopyEditcurl -i -X POST http://localhost:8001/services \
  --data name=example-service \
  --data url=https://api.example.com

This ensures that Kong establishes a secure connection using HTTPS, aligning with the upstream service’s expectations.