Kong Konnect vs Kong Gateway

AspectKong Gateway (self-hosted)Kong Konnect (cloud SaaS)
DeploymentYou install and manage Kong yourself (VMs, Kubernetes, bare metal)Kong hosts the control plane; you run minimal “Data Planes”
UpgradesYou upgrade Kong manuallyKong handles upgrades for control plane automatically
ScalingYou manage scaling (HA, clustering)Kong auto-scales the Control Plane, you scale only Data Planes
SecurityYou manage certificates, patching, hardeningKong handles security for the control plane, you secure data planes
AnalyticsOptional, via your own Prometheus/Grafana, or Enterprise Edition AnalyticsBuilt-in with Konnect — real-time metrics, usage, dashboards
Admin GUIKong Manager on your VMCloud UI in Konnect (always updated)
Developer PortalHost and manage it yourselfCloud-hosted Developer Portal included
RBAC / Single Sign-On (SSO)Enterprise feature; you configure LDAP, OIDC yourselfNative SSO, multi-organization support
PricingLicense + cost of infrastructure + admin workSubscription pricing (includes hosting + support)
ReliabilityDepends on your HA setupKonnect is a SaaS SLA (uptime guaranteed)

Why choose Kong Konnect over self-managed Kong Gateway?

  • Faster to deploy: no need to install, configure, secure Control Plane.
  • Zero maintenance: no patching, backups, upgrades for control plane.
  • Global availability: Control Plane is multi-region by default.
  • Modern features: You get new Kong features faster (Konnect users get earlier access).
  • Built-in observability: native dashboards, logging, analytics ready.
  • Multi-tenant support: You can separate teams, apps, etc easily.
  • Reduced DevOps overhead: focus only on managing lightweight Data Planes.

Leave a comment